Overview › blind review
Verify data
Sampled accuracy
95.1%
sampled · 70 fields · 69 of 70 fields agreed
Open reviews
2
drawn 11:31 and 11:40
What this doesn’t tell you: 95.1% is 69 of 70 fields across five files. It can catch a systematic error and it cannot carry a confidence interval. At the current draw rate it takes about three weeks to reach a number worth quoting outside this page — until then read it as a direction, not a measurement.
HL-40012
14 fields · reviewed 3 of 14Borrower nameNakamura, K.application pg 1agreed
OccupancyPrimary residenceapplication pg 1agreed
Credit score748credit report pg 1
Housing historyOwned, 6 yrcredit report pg 2
Wage income$9,240 / mopaystub pg 1–2
Self-employmentNonetax return pg 1
Rental income$1,100 / moSchedule E pg 3
InvestmentAccounts$41,300statement pg 2
Total obligations$2,840 / mocredit report pg 3
Qualifying payment$1,206.44computed
DebtToIncomeRatio38.9%computed
Property value$612,000appraisal pg 1
Flood zoneZone Xdetermination pg 1
OutcomeApprove, $95,000step 8
InvestmentAccounts came back $41,300 against a statement showing $38,050 — the run read a prior-quarter page. Nothing flagged it, and the file cleared with no interrupt. That’s the one correction in this sample.
Recent reviews
| HL-40119 | 14 fields · 0 corrections | agreed | s.mendo · 12:18 |
| HL-40086 | 14 fields · 1 correction | InvestmentAccounts | j.park · 12:09 |
| HL-40044 | 14 fields · 0 corrections | agreed | j.park · 11:52 |
| HL-39988 | awaiting review | open | drawn 11:31 |